FWIW, I was one of those militating for a new
coach for Simona Halep last year, after her defeat at Singapore in the
final with Serena Williams:
Personally, if I were Halep, with all great results (including on the
financial side), which I'd be blind not to see and appreciate, I'd
change coaches right now, as I honestly don't see any progress on the
crucial technical and strategical side this year:
- STILL no slice
- STILL no volley, no occasional S-V
- not enough dropshots
- STILL no plan B to speak of (see Serena today, she applied her plan B
throughout by coming to the net on each and every short ball)
- not enough coach on-court intervention to change course (perhaps Halep doesn't like that), including in today's match
just a good maintenance at a very good level, for which she should thank the current coach.
I had the same recommendation for Bouchard, even though her results aren't quite at the same level as Halep's.
Otherwise, she will continue to lack the variety of means to beat the
best on a consistent basis, and will wear out her body, by her current
insistance on staying parked at the baseline. She should change her
style more toward's Henin's, than Clijsters'.
Am I too harsh? I don't think so. And I have had this recommendation for
some time; as well, it's only confirmed by today's match.
There is a time for everything, and this is the best time for it, before putting in the hard work for the next season.
Suggestions? Paul Annacone, Stefan Edberg (even part time would help
tremendously; and he might become available), Carlos Rodriguez (I know
he has that academy in China, and he left even Li Na in the lurch
because of it), even Justine Henin (if Mauresmo coaches, why not her?
she has a tennis academy).
Now, Henin might not be available for touring as a coach for now:
Henin willing to look at coaching after having another child
new series of coaches has passed Simona's way and have been dismissed
since then, however the ideas do not seem to have changed in her camp,
for her game plan A wasn't improved, and no plan B has
become available (since November 2014 to this June 2015). In the
meanwhile, she has scored painful defeats (as in
the Australian, at Roland Garros or in even in Miami against Serena),
together with some great success (Indian Wells). Let me be clear, it is a
great achievement to be number 2 or 3 in the world, but it is not even
by far the same as becoming number 1 at the end of the year, or winning
Grand Slams, and this is the name of the game for someone of Simona's
has the shots (the volleys, the dropshots, the high topspin, the slice)
but she is not using them enough or at all, or in the right proportion,
even though she has great hands. I am convinced that, like Bouchard, she
is not training enough such variety, for having it available in matches, and for being mentally ready to use them.
Not only that, but the opposition have caught up to her somewhat
uniform style, and it is _them_ who are using first variety to beat her (Wozniacki, by
slicing and coming to the net to volley, at Stuttgart; Mladenovic, by volleying and dropshotting her at Roland Garros). This should be a big warning sign for Simona.
for one, and being enforced in my convictions by her latest results,
continue to believe that only something similar with Henin's game, based
on variety (in order to befuddle the opponents,
to mess up their footwork and contact point) and shortening of the
exchanges (in order to reduce the body wear), can be successful for
someone of Halep's height, if she wants to be successful against Serena
and Sharapova, or against other heavy hitters, such as Lucic, and if she
wants to achieve that while having a long career in full health.
Wimbledon would be a great place to see such changes implemented: the
grass favors the slice, the dropshots, the net play, the short
exchanges, the breaks in rhythm, the surprise.
A bon entendeur, salut!
Halep making another coaching switch